![]() Or doesn't it make any difference at all? I'm using these drives strictly as storage media. To partition using a guid partition table, partition the drive in os xs disk utility, choosing guid partition map for the scheme (its under the options button at the bottom). When I reformatted them as NTFS, I see only 73.5 MB being used, a considerable difference.Ĭan anyone here comment on the pros and/or cons of these various file systems and how they will benefit (or detract) from my overall usage of these drives? The gpt provides you with a more flexible mechanism for partitioning disks than the older master boot record (mbr) partitioning scheme that has been. ![]() When I formatted these drives as Ext4, however, I see, with no data on the drives, that about 23 GB was being used (for something), reducing the amount of available space by that much. If it says GUID Partition Table, you can format the drive by selecting Mac OS X Extended (Journaled) in the Format pop-up menu, giving the drive a name, and then clicking Erase. ![]() What would be the pros and/or cons of this? (I can, of course, change them back.) I see no difference in anything, operation-wise or performance-wise. Is that true? In any case, I have set these portable hard drives to that system instead of MBR. I have read that GUID is superior to MBR. When I checked them, they were set to MBR and NTFS. I have purchased several new Western Digital portable external hard drives (500 GB). I am currently running Ubuntu 10.04 and my hard disk's Partitioning is set to Master Boot Record with Filesystem type Ext4 (version 1.0).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |